Gem Survey

In response to Mike Clark’s question, here is what I’ve got on my machine:

wei-fieg@nono ~ $ sudo gem list --local | grep '([0-9]\.'
actionmailer (1.3.2, 1.3.1)
actionpack (1.13.2, 1.13.1)
actionwebservice (1.2.2, 1.2.1)
activerecord (1.15.2, 1.15.1)
activesupport (1.4.1, 1.4.0)
acts_as_taggable (2.0.2)
ajax_scaffold_generator (3.1.11, 3.1.10)
capistrano (1.4.0, 1.3.1)
cheat (1.2.1)
coverage (0.3)
deprec (1.2.3, 1.2.1)
facets (1.8.20, 1.7.46)
ferret (0.10.14)
flickr (1.0.0)
highline (1.2.7, 1.2.5)
hoe (1.1.7)
log4r (1.0.5)
mocha (0.4.0)
model_security_generator (0.0.9)
mysql (2.7)
needle (1.3.0)
net-sftp (1.1.0)
net-ssh (1.0.10)
openid_login_generator (0.1)
rails (1.2.2, 1.2.1)
rake (0.7.1)
RedCloth (3.0.4)
ruby-activeldap (0.8.1)
ruby-openid (1.1.4)
ruby-yadis (0.3.4)
rubyforge (0.4.0)
RubyInline (3.6.2)
sources (0.0.1)
streamlined_generator (0.0.5)
tattle (1.0.1)
termios (0.9.4)
wirble (0.1.2)
xml-simple (1.0.10)

Hmm, the number matches that of Mike Clark’s list (but is really low compared to Chad Fowler’s), the individual gems don’t all match up, though. But then, diversification is a good thing.